
Huh. I guess I never really thought they'd try to explain where Bond came from, that's almost part of the mystique. I mean, I like to imagine he was always that money, even back in grade school. He'd have all kinds of escapades and kick people's asses out on the playground and then slip into his seat when the teacher's back was turned. The teacher turns back and he's straightening his clip-on tie while chatting up some bird next to him. Anyway, it looks like Daniel Craig, the man with two first names, is going to play a young bond out on his first mission in Casino Royale. This means no
Major Boothroyd, no gadgets and less swank moneyness. A villian is played by Sebastien Foucan, a co-inventor of
Parkour, which should be fun for chases. There's some trouble with the assassinations and he falls in love with
a girl (which George Lazenby already did in '
On Her Majesty's Secret Service') Bond is supposed to dislike violence and has feelings? You know,
Timothy Dalton already tried being true to the darker, more emotional novel Bond and was met with criticism from people who just wanted a Bond movie. Hmmm. They've used the word gritty several times in the article and I get the feeling that this will be a good action movie, but not a Bond movie.
New James Bond movie: fewer gadgets, more grit - Yahoo! News
1 Comments:
did you read the part about the orgasms? Yowzer!
Post a Comment