(Now) Open Letter to Comcast (douche-bags)
I am furious after trying to use your website and phone lines to lodge a complaint about your digital cable transition. I was angry when I turned on my tv and was informed that I would no longer receive 80% of the channels I'm paying (too much) for. But after viewing the offerings on your website I am irate. It is very clear that this is a deliberate effort to bilk your customers out more money per month. Where is the limited basic cable (analog) offering that I'm now receiving; no matter how many times more my bill is than its value? This service is worth no more than $15 a month, and less in many markets. How many customers do you suppose will keep paying you three or four times more than your services are worth to them?I understand what DTV is and why some people may value it over analog sources. I don't want another comcast box, on demand programming or HD channels. I don't want your remote or your DVRs. I want the same lower quality, lower overhead format of the channels I've been paying you to convey for years. You are a conduit, not a hardware vendor. This ploy of forcing your customers to become more entwined and controlled by your vertical monopoly will result in demonstrable backlash. It will start here. I will degrade my service to limited cable or I will cancel it completely. I was paying you for analog signal. If I'd wanted digital TV you wouldn't have had a customer, that stuff is floating all around us. Free as air. Lyman out.
- We have removed features from your service.
- We think your shit is too old.
- Now you have to pay us $5 for every tv you have. Every month.
- We own your ass, bitch.
Labels: Comcast





You ever get the feeling that the White House is just one big-ass party that you'll never be invited to? Everyone knows the best house parties always wind up with wild exotic animals roaming the grounds and dudes with guns posing manlyly.






2 Comments:
Upon second reading, I feel I should clarify my use of "overhead". I mean lower cost to me, not bandwidth size on the network. Yes, it is very silly that a larger data stream would cost less than a smaller one. However the new system offers no advantage to me, even a hindrance (in the form of adapters and flags) while costing you, the provider, less. Is it not therefore logical that such a stream would cost the consumer less than the aforementioned larger, older, deprecated stream?
Read this too:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24073432/
Even though its so old. I guess its not the fact that this is happening that pisses me off. Its that they flipped the switch one day with no warning, tell everyone resistance is futile and expect to make money butt-over-fist for something people don't want. Lyman out again.
I work for Comcast. I might be able to get you a better and cheaper package. If you're interested, please contact me and provide the phone number on the account.
Mark Casem
Comcast Corp.
National Customer Operations
We_Can_Help@cable.comcast.com
Post a Comment